RESTRICTIVE RULES ON MEDICAL AID IN DYING FAILING CANADIANS

 


OTTAWA – On Tuesday, marking the two year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on medical aid in dying, NDP Justice Critic Murray Rankin issued a scathing assessment of the government’s restrictive rules on physician assisted dying legislation.
 
“Medical experts, legal scholars and parliamentarians tried to warn the government about the flaws in their bill; now it’s clear those flawed rules are failing to put patients first,” said Rankin, a former law professor who served on the all-party committee that advised the government before the introduction of Bill C-14 last year.
 
Since the new law took effect, there have been numerous reports of patients denied the choice of medical aid in dying, forced to seek assistance in foreign jurisdictions, or subjected to painful moves between hospitals because of institutional objections, as well as concerns about inadequate federal data collection.
 
“It’s both tragic and cruel that Canadians are still required to go to such great and costly lengths to end their suffering,” said Senator Cowan, “It not only shows a lack of compassion, but is inconsistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Carter. We simply must do better.”
 
Bill C-14 was widely criticized for denying the choice of medical aid in dying to patients suffering from chronic, but not terminal, conditions, leading one of Canada’s top constitutional experts to declare the government’s bill unconstitutional. A legal challenge was launched immediately and is now before the courts in Lamb v Canada.